Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-12-1-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-12-1-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
05 Jan 2026
| 05 Jan 2026
Bayesian hierarchical modelling of intensity-duration-frequency curves using a climate model large ensemble
Alexander Lee Rischmuller
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Research Unit Sustainability and Climate Risk, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, 20144 Hamburg, Germany
Benjamin Poschlod
Research Unit Sustainability and Climate Risk, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, 20144 Hamburg, Germany
Jana Sillmann
Research Unit Sustainability and Climate Risk, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, 20144 Hamburg, Germany
Center for International Climate Research (CICERO), 0349 Oslo, Norway
Related authors
No articles found.
Anastasia Vogelbacher, Malte von Szombathely, Marc Lennartz, Benjamin Poschlod, and Jana Sillmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6362, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6362, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we address risk to pluvial floods by following the risk definition of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), developed in co-operation with stakeholders. We identify buildings in urban areas where residents face higher flood risk due to greater social vulnerability, increased exposure, or elevated flood hazard. We present the development and application of a Python-based ArcGIS toolbox for estimating pluvial flood risk at building scale.
Marc Lennartz, Benjamin Poschlod, and Bruno Merz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6419, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6419, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting hourly rainfall extremes under climate change is crucial yet highly uncertain. Using convection-permitting climate model data over Germany, we compare stationary and non-stationary GEV and sMEV methods. Results show that the sMEV approach exhibits lower uncertainty across return periods. Moreover, the non-stationary sMEV better captures climate-change-induced changes, though care is needed when projecting future extremes.
Philip J. Ward, Sophie Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Judith Claassen, James Daniell, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Stefania Gottardo, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Julius Schlumberger, Timothy Tiggeloven, Silvia Torresan, Nicole van Maanen, Andrew Warren, Carmen D. Álvarez-Albelo, Vanessa Banks, Benjamin Blanz, Veronica Casartelli, Jordan Correa González, Julia Crummy, Anne Sophie Daloz, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Juan José Díaz-Hernández, Jaime Díaz-Pacheco, Pedro Dorta Antequera, Davide Ferrario, Sara García-González, Joel Gill, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Wiebke Jäger, Abel López-Díez, Lin Ma, Jaroslav Mysiak, Diep Ngoc Nguyen, Noemi Padrón Fumero, Eva-Cristina Petrescu, Karina Reiter, Jana Sillmann, and Lara Smale
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5897, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5897, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Disasters often result from interactions between different hazards, like floods triggering landslides, or earthquakes followed by tropical cyclones, so-called multi-hazards. People and societies are increasingly exposed and vulnerable to these multi-hazards. Assessing these aspects is referred to as multi-(hazard-)risk assessment and management. In this paper we synthesise key learnings from the MYRIAD-EU project, reflecting on progress and challenges faced in addressing multi-(hazard-)risk.
Iris Mužić, Øivind Hodnebrog, Yeliz A. Yilmaz, Terje K. Berntsen, Jana Sillmann, David M. Lawrence, and Paul A. Dirmeyer
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 11, 273–292, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-11-273-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-11-273-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates soil moisture–temperature coupling during the extreme warm conditions in May–August 2018 in southern and central Sweden using the merged GLEAM-E-OBS dataset and four simulations from the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Community Terrestrial Systems Model (WRF-CTSM). Based on changes in surface soil moisture, evaporative fraction, and daily maximum 2 m temperature, on average across the region and five datasets, the coupling lasted for 22 d.
Kai Kornuber, Emanuele Bevacqua, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Wiebke S. Jäger, Pauline Rivoire, Cassandra D. W. Rogers, Fabiola Banfi, Fulden Batibeniz, James Carruthers, Carlo de Michele, Silvia de Angeli, Cristina Deidda, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Andreas H. Fink, Henrique M. D. Goulart, Katharina Küpfer, Patrick Ludwig, Douglas Maraun, Gabriele Messori, Shruti Nath, Fiachra O’Loughlin, Joaquim G. Pinto, Benjamin Poschlod, Alexandre M. Ramos, Colin Raymond, Andreia F. S. Ribeiro, Deepti Singh, Laura Suarez Gutierrez, Philip J. Ward, and Christopher J. White
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4683, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4683, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Impacts from extreme weather events are becoming increasingly severe under global warming, in particular when events occur simultaneously or successively. While these complex event combinations are often difficult to analyse as impact data, early warning schemes or modelling frameworks might not be fit for purpose. In this perspective we reflect on the usability of compound event research to bridge the gap between academic research and real-world applications, by formulating a set of guidelines.
Natalia Castillo Bautista, Marco Gaetani, Leonard F. Borchert, Benjamin Poschlod, Lukas Brunner, Jana Sillmann, and Mario L. V. Martina
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5073, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5073, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
When hot temperatures and drought occur together (compound events), they can cause harmful impacts on crops and society. Using six decades of climate data, we show that such compound events repeatedly occurred in three breadbaskets of the Northern Hemisphere. These events are linked to atmospheric circulation patterns that favor heat and dryness, which in turn interact to amplify the impact. Our study contributes to understand the drivers of these events to support climate impact assessment.
Maša Ann, Jörn Behrens, and Jana Sillmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3505, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3505, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new framework based on Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) to better detect outliers and model extremes. Unlike standard DMD, which focuses on average system behavior, our approach targets rare, exceptional dynamics. Applied to climate data, it improves extreme event approximation and reveals meaningful spatio-temporal patterns. The method may generalize to other types of extremes.
Timothy Tiggeloven, Colin Raymond, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Jana Sillmann, Annegret H. Thieken, Sophie L. Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Emma Cordier, Julia M. Crummy, Lydia Cumiskey, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Davide M. Ferrario, Wiebke S. Jäger, Elco E. Koks, Nicole van Maanen, Heather J. Murdock, Jaroslav Mysiak, Sadhana Nirandjan, Benjamin Poschlod, Peter Priesmeier, Nivedita Sairam, Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Tristian R. Stolte, Marie-Luise Zenker, James E. Daniell, Alexander Fekete, Christian M. Geiß, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Sirkku K. Juhola, Christian Kuhlicke, Karen Lebek, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Stefan Schneiderbauer, Silvia Torresan, Cees J. van Westen, Judith N. Claassen, Bijan Khazai, Virginia Murray, Julius Schlumberger, and Philip J. Ward
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2771, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2771, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Natural hazards like floods, earthquakes, and landslides are often interconnected which may create bigger problems than when they occur alone. We studied expert discussions from an international conference to understand how scientists and policymakers can better prepare for these multi-hazards and use new technologies to protect its communities while contributing to dialogues about future international agreements beyond the Sendai Framework and supporting global sustainability goals.
Nina Schuhen, Carley E. Iles, Marit Sandstad, Viktor Ananiev, and Jana Sillmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3331, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3331, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
As climate changes, extremes are becoming increasingly frequent. We investigate the time of emergence for a large range of different extremes, meaning the earliest time when a significant change in these extremes can be detected beyond natural variability, whether in the past or in the future. The results based on 21 global climate models show considerable differences between regions, types of indices and emissions scenarios, as well as between temperature and precipitation extremes.
Benjamin Poschlod, Laura Sailer, Alexander Sasse, Anastasia Vogelbacher, and Ralf Ludwig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2483, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Europe was hit by severe droughts in recent years resulting in extreme low flow conditions in rivers. Here, we investigate future climate change effects on river droughts in Bavaria. We find increasing severity for the low peak discharge and low flow duration in a warmer climate. This is caused by hotter and drier summers, where the joint occurrence of heat and drought intensifies. Further, we show that conditions in the year before the drought gain more importance in a warmer climate.
Florian Zabel, Matthias Knüttel, and Benjamin Poschlod
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1067–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
CropSuite is a new open-source crop suitability model. It provides a GUI and a wide range of options, including a spatial downscaling of climate data. We apply CropSuite to 48 staple and opportunity crops at a 1 km spatial resolution in Africa. We find that climate variability significantly impacts suitable areas but also affects optimal sowing dates and multiple cropping potential. The results provide valuable information for climate impact assessments, adaptation, and land-use planning.
Detlef van Vuuren, Brian O'Neill, Claudia Tebaldi, Louise Chini, Pierre Friedlingstein, Tomoko Hasegawa, Keywan Riahi, Benjamin Sanderson, Bala Govindasamy, Nico Bauer, Veronika Eyring, Cheikh Fall, Katja Frieler, Matthew Gidden, Laila Gohar, Andrew Jones, Andrew King, Reto Knutti, Elmar Kriegler, Peter Lawrence, Chris Lennard, Jason Lowe, Camila Mathison, Shahbaz Mehmood, Luciana Prado, Qiang Zhang, Steven Rose, Alexander Ruane, Carl-Friederich Schleussner, Roland Seferian, Jana Sillmann, Chris Smith, Anna Sörensson, Swapna Panickal, Kaoru Tachiiri, Naomi Vaughan, Saritha Vishwanathan, Tokuta Yokohata, and Tilo Ziehn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3765, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3765, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a set of six plausible 21st century emission scenarios, and their multi-century extensions, that will be used by the international community of climate modeling centers to produce the next generation of climate projections. These projections will support climate, impact and mitigation researchers, provide information to practitioners to address future risks from climate change, and contribute to policymakers’ considerations of the trade-offs among various levels of mitigation.
Viktoria Spaiser, Sirkku Juhola, Sara M. Constantino, Weisi Guo, Tabitha Watson, Jana Sillmann, Alessandro Craparo, Ashleigh Basel, John T. Bruun, Krishna Krishnamurthy, Jürgen Scheffran, Patricia Pinho, Uche T. Okpara, Jonathan F. Donges, Avit Bhowmik, Taha Yasseri, Ricardo Safra de Campos, Graeme S. Cumming, Hugues Chenet, Florian Krampe, Jesse F. Abrams, James G. Dyke, Stefanie Rynders, Yevgeny Aksenov, and Bryan M. Spears
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1179–1206, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1179-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1179-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we identify potential negative social tipping points linked to Earth system destabilization and draw on related research to understand the drivers and likelihood of these negative social tipping dynamics, their potential effects on human societies and the Earth system, and the potential for cascading interactions and contribution to systemic risks.
Benjamin Poschlod and Anne Sophie Daloz
The Cryosphere, 18, 1959–1981, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1959-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1959-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Information about snow depth is important within climate research but also many other sectors, such as tourism, mobility, civil engineering, and ecology. Climate models often feature a spatial resolution which is too coarse to investigate snow depth. Here, we analyse high-resolution simulations and identify added value compared to a coarser-resolution state-of-the-art product. Also, daily snow depth extremes are well reproduced by two models.
Clemens Schwingshackl, Anne Sophie Daloz, Carley Iles, Kristin Aunan, and Jana Sillmann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 331–354, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-331-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ambient heat in European cities will substantially increase under global warming, as projected by three heat metrics calculated from high-resolution climate model simulations. While the heat metrics consistently project high levels of ambient heat for several cities, in other cities the projected heat levels vary considerably across the three heat metrics. Using complementary heat metrics for projections of ambient heat is thus important for assessments of future risks from heat stress.
Florian Zabel and Benjamin Poschlod
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5383–5399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5383-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Today, most climate model data are provided at daily time steps. However, more and more models from different sectors, such as energy, water, agriculture, and health, require climate information at a sub-daily temporal resolution for a more robust and reliable climate impact assessment. Here we describe and validate the Teddy tool, a new model for the temporal disaggregation of daily climate model data for climate impact analysis.
Philip J. Ward, James Daniell, Melanie Duncan, Anna Dunne, Cédric Hananel, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Annegien Tijssen, Silvia Torresan, Roxana Ciurean, Joel C. Gill, Jana Sillmann, Anaïs Couasnon, Elco Koks, Noemi Padrón-Fumero, Sharon Tatman, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Adewole Adesiyun, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Alexander Alabaster, Bernard Bulder, Carlos Campillo Torres, Andrea Critto, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Marta Machado, Jaroslav Mysiak, Rene Orth, Irene Palomino Antolín, Eva-Cristina Petrescu, Markus Reichstein, Timothy Tiggeloven, Anne F. Van Loon, Hung Vuong Pham, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1487–1497, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The majority of natural-hazard risk research focuses on single hazards (a flood, a drought, a volcanic eruption, an earthquake, etc.). In the international research and policy community it is recognised that risk management could benefit from a more systemic approach. In this perspective paper, we argue for an approach that addresses multi-hazard, multi-risk management through the lens of sustainability challenges that cut across sectors, regions, and hazards.
Katja Weigel, Lisa Bock, Bettina K. Gier, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Kemisola Adeniyi, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Peter Berg, Louis-Philippe Caron, Irene Cionni, Susanna Corti, Niels Drost, Alasdair Hunter, Llorenç Lledó, Christian Wilhelm Mohr, Aytaç Paçal, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Valeriu Predoi, Marit Sandstad, Jana Sillmann, Andreas Sterl, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, and Veronika Eyring
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3159–3184, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents new diagnostics for the Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 on the hydrological cycle, extreme events, impact assessment, regional evaluations, and ensemble member selection. The ESMValTool v2.0 diagnostics are developed by a large community of scientists aiming to facilitate the evaluation and comparison of Earth system models (ESMs) with a focus on the ESMs participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP).
Benjamin Poschlod, Ralf Ludwig, and Jana Sillmann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 983–1003, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-983-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-983-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides a homogeneous data set of 10-year rainfall return levels based on 50 simulations of the Canadian Regional Climate Model v5 (CRCM5). In order to evaluate its quality, the return levels are compared to those of observation-based rainfall of 16 European countries from 32 different sources. The CRCM5 is able to capture the general spatial pattern of observed extreme precipitation, and also the intensity is reproduced in 77 % of the area for rainfall durations of 3 h and longer.
Cited articles
Agilan, V. and Umamahesh, N.: What are the best covariates for developing non-stationary rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationship?, Advances in Water Resources, 101, 11–22, 2017. a
Alaya, M. B., Zwiers, F., and Zhang, X.: An evaluation of block-maximum-based estimation of very long return period precipitation extremes with a large ensemble climate simulation, Journal of Climate, 33, 6957–6970, 2020. a
Anderson, D., Burnham, K., and White, G.: Comparison of Akaike information criterion and consistent Akaike information criterion for model selection and statistical inference from capture-recapture studies, Journal of Applied Statistics, 25, 263–282, 1998. a
Ban, N., Rajczak, J., Schmidli, J., and Schär, C.: Analysis of Alpine precipitation extremes using generalized extreme value theory in convection-resolving climate simulations, Climate Dynamics, 55, 61–75, 2020. a
Banerjee, S. and Fuentes, M.: Bayesian modeling for large spatial datasets, WIREs Computational Statistics, 4, 59–66, https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.187, 2012. a
Bassett, R., Young, P., Blair, G., Samreen, F., and Simm, W.: A large ensemble approach to quantifying internal model variability within the WRF numerical model, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125, e2019JD031286, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031286, 2020. a
Beneyto, C., Aranda, J. Á., Benito, G., and Francés, F.: New approach to estimate extreme flooding using continuous synthetic simulation supported by regional precipitation and non-systematic flood data, Water, 12, 3174, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113174, 2020. a
Berger, J. O.: Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 9781475742862, 1985. a
Bevacqua, E., Suarez-Gutierrez, L., Jézéquel, A., Lehner, F., Vrac, M., Yiou, P., and Zscheischler, J.: Advancing research on compound weather and climate events via large ensemble model simulations, Nature Communications, 14, 2145, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37847-5, 2023. a
Bhatia, U. and Ganguly, A. R.: Precipitation extremes and depth-duration-frequency under internal climate variability, Scientific reports, 9, 9112, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45673-3, 2019. a
Brönnimann, S., Rajczak, J., Fischer, E. M., Raible, C. C., Rohrer, M., and Schär, C.: Changing seasonality of moderate and extreme precipitation events in the Alps, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2047–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2047-2018, 2018. a
Bücher, A., Lilienthal, J., Kinsvater, P., and Fried, R.: Penalized quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for extreme value models with application to flood frequency analysis, Extremes, 24, 325–348, 2021. a
Cannon, A. J. and Innocenti, S.: Projected intensification of sub-daily and daily rainfall extremes in convection-permitting climate model simulations over North America: implications for future intensity–duration–frequency curves, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 421–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-421-2019, 2019. a
Chib, S. and Greenberg, E.: Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm, The American Statistician, 49, 327–335, 1995. a
Cooley, D. and Sain, S. R.: Spatial Hierarchical Modeling of Precipitation Extremes From a Regional Climate Model, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 15, 381–402, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-010-0023-9, 2010. a, b
Cooley, D., Nychka, D., and Naveau, P.: Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Extreme Precipitation Return Levels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 824–840, https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000000780, 2007. a, b
De Paola, F., Giugni, M., Pugliese, F., Annis, A., and Nardi, F.: GEV parameter estimation and stationary vs. non-stationary analysis of extreme rainfall in African test cities, Hydrology, 5, 28, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5020028, 2018. a
Deser, C., Lehner, F., Rodgers, K. B., Ault, T., Delworth, T. L., DiNezio, P. N., Fiore, A., Frankignoul, C., Fyfe, J. C., Horton, D. E., Kay, J. E., Knutti, R., Lovenduski, N. S., Marotzke, J., McKinnon, K. A., Minobe, S., Randerson, J., Screen, J. A., Simpson, I. R., and Ting, M.: Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects, Nature Climate Change, 10, 277–286, 2020. a, b
Deutscher Wetterdienst: CDC – Climate Data Center, Deutscher Wetterdienst [data set], https://cdc.dwd.de/portal/ (last access: 6 April 2025), 2022. a
Dyrrdal, A. V., Lenkoski, A., Thorarinsdottir, T. L., and Stordal, F.: Bayesian hierarchical modeling of extreme hourly precipitation in Norway, Environmetrics, 26, 89–106, https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2301, 2015. a, b, c
Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J.: An introduction to the bootstrap, Chapman and Hall/CRC, ISBN 9780429246593, 1994. a
Fauer, F. S. and Rust, H. W.: Non-stationary large-scale statistics of precipitation extremes in central Europe, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 37, 4417–4429, 2023. a
Fauer, F. S., Ulrich, J., Jurado, O. E., and Rust, H. W.: Flexible and consistent quantile estimation for intensity–duration–frequency curves, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6479–6494, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6479-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Fauer, F. S., Ulrich, J., Mack, L., Jurado, O. E., Ritschel, C., Detring, C., and Joedicke, S.: IDF: Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves, r package version 2.1.2, CRAN [code], https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.IDF, 2022. a
Fereshtehpour, M. and Najafi, M. R.: Urban stormwater resilience: Global insights and strategies for climate adaptation, Urban Climate, 59, 102290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102290, 2025. a
Fischer, E., Sippel, S., and Knutti, R.: Increasing probability of record-shattering climate extremes, Nature Climate Change, 11, 689–695, 2021. a
Fisher, R. A. and Tippett, L. H. C.: Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample, in: Mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge philosophical society, Cambridge University Press,24, 180–190, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100015681, 1928. a, b
Fosser, G., Kendon, E. J., Stephenson, D., and Tucker, S.: Convection-permitting models offer promise of more certain extreme rainfall projections, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL088151, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088151, 2020. a
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., Westra, S., Allan, R. P., Ban, N., Barbero, R., Berg, P., Blenkinsop, S., Do, H. X., Guerreiro, S., Haerter, J. O., Kendon, E. J., Lewis, E., Schaer, C., Sharma, A., Villarini, G., Wasko, C., and Zhang, X.: Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2, 107–122, 2021. a
Ghil, M., Yiou, P., Hallegatte, S., Malamud, B. D., Naveau, P., Soloviev, A., Friederichs, P., Keilis-Borok, V., Kondrashov, D., Kossobokov, V., Mestre, O., Nicolis, C., Rust, H. W., Shebalin, P., Vrac, M., Witt, A., and Zaliapin, I.: Extreme events: dynamics, statistics and prediction, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 295–350, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-295-2011, 2011. a
Gilleland, E. and Katz, R. W.: extRemes 2.0: An extreme value analysis package in R, Journal of Statistical Software, 72, 1–39, 2016. a
Gnedenko, B.: Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une serie aleatoire, Annals of mathematics, 44, 423–453, 1943. a
Gupta, V. K. and Waymire, E.: Multiscaling properties of spatial rainfall and river flow distributions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 95, 1999–2009, 1990. a
Hamdi, Y., Haigh, I. D., Parey, S., and Wahl, T.: Preface: Advances in extreme value analysis and application to natural hazards, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1461–1465, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1461-2021, 2021. a
Haslinger, K., Breinl, K., Pavlin, L., Pistotnik, G., Bertola, M., Olefs, M., Greilinger, M., Schöner, W., and Blöschl, G.: Increasing hourly heavy rainfall in Austria reflected in flood changes, Nature, 639, 667–672, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08647-2, 2025. a
Hoffman, M. D. and Gelman, A.: The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1593–1623, 2014. a
Hosking, J. R.: L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 52, 105–124, 1990. a
Hosking, J. R. M. and Wallis, J. R.: Regional frequency analysis, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780511529443, 1997. a
Hosking, J. R. M., Wallis, J. R., and Wood, E. F.: Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments, Technometrics, 27, 251–261, 1985. a
Huang, W. K., Stein, M. L., McInerney, D. J., Sun, S., and Moyer, E. J.: Estimating changes in temperature extremes from millennial-scale climate simulations using generalized extreme value (GEV) distributions, Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 2, 79–103, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-79-2016, 2016. a
Huang, W. K., Monahan, A. H., and Zwiers, F. W.: Estimating concurrent climate extremes: A conditional approach, Weather and Climate Extremes, 33, 100332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2021.100332, 2021. a
Jung, C. and Schindler, D.: Precipitation Atlas for Germany (GePrA), Atmosphere, 10, 737, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10120737, 2019. a
Kendall, M. G.: A new measure of rank correlation, Biometrika, 30, 81–93, 1938. a
Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., and Hegerl, G. C.: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations, Journal of Climate, 20, 1419–1444, 2007. a
Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., and Wehner, M.: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble, Climatic change, 119, 345–357, 2013. a
Kim, H., Shin, J.-Y., Kim, T., Kim, S., and Heo, J.-H.: Regional frequency analysis of extreme precipitation based on a nonstationary population index flood method, Advances in Water Resources, 146, 103757, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103757, 2020. a
Koutsoyiannis, D. and Papalexiou, S. M.: Extreme rainfall: Global perspective, in: Handbook of applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill New York, NY, vol. 74, 1–74, ISBN 9780071835091, 2017. a
Lang, A. and Poschlod, B.: Updating catastrophe models to today’s climate–An application of a large ensemble approach to extreme rainfall, Climate Risk Management, 44, 100594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2024.100594, 2024. a
Leduc, M. , Mailhot, A., Frigon, A., Martel, J. L., Ludwig, R., Brietzke, G. B., Giguère, M., Brissette, F., Turcotte, R., Braun, M., and Scinocca, J.: The ClimEx project: A 50-member ensemble of climate change projections at 12-km resolution over Europe and northeastern North America with the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5), Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 58, 663–693, 2019. a, b
Lenderink, G., de Vries, H., van Meijgaard, E., van der Wiel, K., and Selten, F.: A perfect model study on the reliability of the added small-scale information in regional climate change projections, Climate Dynamics, 60, 2563–2579, 2023. a
Lewis, E., Fowler, H., Alexander, L., Dunn, R., McClean, F., Barbero, R., Guerreiro, S., Li, X.-F., and Blenkinsop, S.: GSDR: a global sub-daily rainfall dataset, Journal of Climate, 32, 4715–4729, 2019. a
Lucas-Picher, P., Argüeso, D., Brisson, E., Tramblay, Y., Berg, P., Lemonsu, A., Kotlarski, S., and Caillaud, C.: Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12, e731, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.731, 2021. a, b
Mann, H. B.: Nonparametric tests against trend, Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 13, 245–259, https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187, 1945. a
Marra, F., Nikolopoulos, E. I., Anagnostou, E. N., and Morin, E.: Metastatistical Extreme Value analysis of hourly rainfall from short records: Estimation of high quantiles and impact of measurement errors, Advances in Water Resources, 117, 27–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.05.001, 2018. a
Martel, J.-L., Mailhot, A., Brissette, F., and Caya, D.: Role of natural climate variability in the detection of anthropogenic climate change signal for mean and extreme precipitation at local and regional scales, Journal of Climate, 31, 4241–4263, 2018. a
Martel, J.-L., Mailhot, A., and Brissette, F.: Global and regional projected changes in 100-yr subdaily, daily, and multiday precipitation extremes estimated from three large ensembles of climate simulations, Journal of Climate, 33, 1089–1103, 2020. a
Martel, J.-L., Brissette, F. P., Lucas-Picher, P., Troin, M., and Arsenault, R.: Climate change and rainfall intensity–duration–frequency curves: Overview of science and guidelines for adaptation, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 26, 03121001, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002122, 2021. a
Martins, E. S. and Stedinger, J. R.: Generalized maximum-likelihood generalized extreme-value quantile estimators for hydrologic data, Water Resources Research, 36, 737–744, 2000. a
Martins, E. S. and Stedinger, J. R.: Historical information in a generalized Maximum Likelihood Framework with partial duration and annual maximum series, Water Resources Research, 37, 2559–2567, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR000009, 2001. a
Mattingly, K. S., Seymour, L., and Miller, P. W.: Estimates of Extreme Precipitation Frequency Derived from Spatially Dense Rain Gauge Observations: A Case Study of Two Urban Areas in the Colorado Front Range Region, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, 1499–1518, 2017. a
McElreath, R.: Statistical Rethinking, A Course in R and Stan, CRC Press, ISBN 9780367139919, 2015. a
Meredith, E. P., Maraun, D., Semenov, V. A., and Park, W.: Evidence for added value of convection-permitting models for studying changes in extreme precipitation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120, 12500–12513, 2015. a
Nadarajah, S., Anderson, C. W., and Tawn, J. A.: Ordered multivariate extremes, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 60, 473–496, 1998. a
Naveau, P., Hannart, A., and Ribes, A.: Statistical methods for extreme event attribution in climate science, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 7, 89–110, 2020. a
Overeem, A., Buishand, A., and Holleman, I.: Rainfall depth-duration-frequency curves and their uncertainties, Journal of Hydrology, 348, 124–134, 2008. a
Papalexiou, S. M., AghaKouchak, A., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: A diagnostic framework for understanding climatology of tails of hourly precipitation extremes in the United States, Water Resources Research, 54, 6725–6738, 2018. a
Poschlod, B.: Attributing heavy rainfall event in Berchtesgadener Land to recent climate change–Further rainfall intensification projected for the future, Weather and Climate Extremes, 38, 100492, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2022.100492, 2022. a
Poschlod, B. and Daloz, A. S.: Snow depth in high-resolution regional climate model simulations over southern Germany – suitable for extremes and impact-related research?, The Cryosphere, 18, 1959–1981, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1959-2024, 2024. a
Poschlod, B. and Koh, J.: Convection-permitting climate models can support observations to generate rainfall return levels, Water Resources Research, 60, e2023WR035159, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035159, 2024. a, b
Poschlod, B. and Ludwig, R.: Internal variability and temperature scaling of future sub-daily rainfall return levels over Europe, Environmental Research Letters, 16, 064097, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0849, 2021. a, b
Poschlod, B., Zscheischler, J., Sillmann, J., Wood, R. R., and Ludwig, R.: Climate change effects on hydrometeorological compound events over southern Norway, Weather and climate extremes, 28, 100253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100253, 2020. a
Prein, A. F., Langhans, W., Fosser, G., Ferrone, A., Ban, N., Goergen, K., Keller, M., Tölle, M., Gutjahr, O., Feser, F., Brisson, E., Kollet, S., Schmidli, J., van Lipzig, N. P. M., and Leung, R.: A review on regional convection-permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges, Reviews of geophysics, 53, 323–361, 2015. a
Prescott, P. and Walden, A.: Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the generalized extreme-value distribution, Biometrika, 67, 723–724, 1980. a
Pumo, D., Francipane, A., Alongi, F., and Noto, L. V.: The potential of multilayer green roofs for stormwater management in urban area under semi-arid Mediterranean climate conditions, Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116643, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116643, 2023. a
Ragulina, G. and Reitan, T.: Generalized extreme value shape parameter and its nature for extreme precipitation using long time series and the Bayesian approach, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62, 863–879, 2017. a
Räty, O., Laine, M., Leijala, U., Särkkä, J., and Johansson, M. M.: Bayesian hierarchical modelling of sea-level extremes in the Finnish coastal region, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2403–2418, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2403-2023, 2023. a
Röver, C. and Friede, T.: Dynamically borrowing strength from another study through shrinkage estimation, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 29, 293–308, 2020. a
Ruiz-Villanueva, V., Borga, M., Zoccatelli, D., Marchi, L., Gaume, E., and Ehret, U.: Extreme flood response to short-duration convective rainfall in South-West Germany, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1543–1559, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1543-2012, 2012. a
Saeb, A.: gnFit: Goodness-of-Fit Tests Based on Chen-Balakrishnan, r package version 0.2.0, CRAN [code], https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.gnFit, 2018. a
Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., and Kitagawa, G.: Akaike information criterion statistics, J. Am. Stat. A., 83, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478680, 1988. a
Schwalm, C. R., Glendon, S., and Duffy, P. B.: RCP8. 5 tracks cumulative CO2 emissions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 19656–19657, 2020. a
Schwarzak, S., Haensel, S., and Matschullat, J.: Projected changes in extreme precipitation characteristics for Central Eastern Germany (21st century, model-based analysis), International Journal of Climatology, 35, 2724–2734, 2015. a
Semenov, M. A.: Simulation of extreme weather events by a stochastic weather generator, Climate Research, 35, 203–212, 2008. a
Seneviratne, S. I., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C., Luca, A. D., Ghosh, S., Iskandar, I., Kossin, J., Lewis, S., Otto, F., Pinto, I., Satoh, M., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Wehner, M., Zhou, B., and Allan, R.: Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate, in: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Pörtner, H.-O. Chan, J., Sorteberg, A., and Vera, C., Chap. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 571–766, ISBN 9781009325844, 2022. a
Shehu, B., Willems, W., Stockel, H., Thiele, L.-B., and Haberlandt, U.: Regionalisation of rainfall depth–duration–frequency curves with different data types in Germany, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1109–1132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1109-2023, 2023. a, b, c, d
Shin, H., Jung, Y., Jeong, C., and Heo, J.-H.: Assessment of modified Anderson–Darling test statistics for the generalized extreme value and generalized logistic distributions, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 26, 105–114, 2012. a
Sivia, D. and Skilling, J.: Data analysis: a Bayesian tutorial, OUP Oxford, ISBN 9780198568322, 2006. a
Stan Development Team: RStan: the R interface to Stan, r package version 2.32.7, Stan [code], https://mc-stan.org/ (last access: 1 February 2025), 2025. a
Stedinger, J. R.: Frequency analysis of extreme events, Handbook of hydrology, ISBN 9780070397323, 1993. a
Stein, M. L.: Some statistical issues in climate science, Statist. Sci., 35, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.1214/19-STS730, 2020. a, b
Steirou, E., Gerlitz, L., Apel, H., Sun, X., and Merz, B.: Climate influences on flood probabilities across Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1305–1322, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1305-2019, 2019. a
Stephens, M. A.: EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons, Journal of the American statistical Association, 69, 730–737, 1974. a
Tarasova, L., Merz, R., Kiss, A., Basso, S., Blöschl, G., Merz, B., Viglione, A., Plötner, S., Guse, B., Schumann, A., Fischer, S., Ahrens, B., Anwar, F., Bárdossy, A., Bühler, P., Haberlandt, U., Kreibich, H., Krug, A., Lun, D., Müller-Thomy, H., Pidoto, R., Primo, C., Seidel, J., Vorogushyn, S., and Wietzke, L.: Causative classification of river flood events, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6, e1353, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1353, 2019. a
Ullrich, S. L., Hegnauer, M., Nguyen, D. V., Merz, B., Kwadijk, J., and Vorogushyn, S.: Comparative evaluation of two types of stochastic weather generators for synthetic precipitation in the Rhine basin, Journal of Hydrology, 601, 126544, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126544, 2021. a
Ulrich, J., Fauer, F. S., and Rust, H. W.: Modeling seasonal variations of extreme rainfall on different timescales in Germany, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6133–6149, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6133-2021, 2021. a
van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., and Yau, C.: Bayesian statistics and modelling, Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1, 1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2, 2021. a
Van de Vyver, H.: Spatial regression models for extreme precipitation in Belgium, Water Resources Research, 48, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011707, 2012. a, b
van den Hurk, B., van Meijgaard, E., de Valk, P., van Heeringen, K.-J., and Gooijer, J.: Analysis of a compounding surge and precipitation event in the Netherlands, Environmental Research Letters, 10, 035001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/035001, 2015. a
Veenman, M., Stefan, A. M., and Haaf, J. M.: Bayesian hierarchical modeling: An introduction and reassessment, Behavior Research Methods, 56, 4600–4631, 2024. a
Vijayaraghavan, K., Biswal, B. K., Adam, M. G., Soh, S. H., Tsen-Tieng, D. L., Davis, A. P., Chew, S. H., Tan, P. Y., Babovic, V., and Balasubramanian, R.: Bioretention systems for stormwater management: Recent advances and future prospects, Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112766, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112766, 2021. a
Wilks, D. S. and Wilby, R. L.: The weather generation game: a review of stochastic weather models, Progress in physical geography, 23, 329–357, 1999. a
Yang, L., Franzke, C. L., and Fu, Z.: Evaluation of the ability of regional climate models and a statistical model to represent the spatial characteristics of extreme precipitation, International Journal of Climatology, 40, 6612–6628, 2020. a
Yiou, P. and Nogaj, M.: Extreme climatic events and weather regimes over the North Atlantic: when and where?, Geophysical Research Letters, 31, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019119, 2004. a
Zyphur, M. J. and Oswald, F. L.: Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide, Journal of Management, 41, 390–420, 2015. a
Short summary
Extreme precipitation probability estimation is vital for hazard protection design but has high uncertainty. We tested six statistical models using 2000 years of climate data. Our Bayesian hierarchical duration-dependent Generalized Extreme Value model shows the highest accuracy and robustness for sample sizes between 30 and 100 years, making it highly promising for use with limited observational records.
Extreme precipitation probability estimation is vital for hazard protection design but has high...
