Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-1-1-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-1-1-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Simulation of future climate under changing temporal covariance structures
W. B. Leeds
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Quantitative Researcher, The Climate Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA
E. J. Moyer
Dept. of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
M. L. Stein
Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Benjamin W. Clouser, Carly C. KleinStern, Adrien Desmoulin, Clare E. Singer, Jason M. St. Clair, Thomas F. Hanisco, David S. Sayres, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 1147–1163, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1147-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1147-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Water molecules comes in several varieties, of which H216O is the most common. These varieties behave differently enough under freezing to create strong changes in the ratio of heavy to light water molecules. Here we compare observations of these ratios from satellites and high-altitude airborne instruments. These observations provide information about how air reaches the upper parts of the atmosphere, so it is important to reconcile difference between different modes of observations.
Benjamin W. Clouser, Laszlo C. Sarkozy, Clare E. Singer, Carly C. KleinStern, Adrien Desmoulin, Dylan Gaeta, Sergey Khaykin, Stephen Gabbard, Stephen Shertz, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6465–6491, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6465-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6465-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The water molecule comes in several different varieties, which are nearly indistinguishable in daily life. However, slight differences between the water molecule types can be exploited to achieve better scientific understanding of parts of Earth's atmosphere. In this work we describe the design, construction, and operation of an instrument meant to measure these molecules aboard research aircraft up to altitudes of 20 km.
Paul Konopka, Christian Rolf, Marc von Hobe, Sergey M. Khaykin, Benjamin Clouser, Elisabeth Moyer, Fabrizio Ravegnani, Francesco D'Amato, Silvia Viciani, Nicole Spelten, Armin Afchine, Martina Krämer, Fred Stroh, and Felix Ploeger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 12935–12947, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12935-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12935-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We studied water vapor in a critical region of the atmosphere, the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, using rare in situ observations. Our study shows that extremely high water vapor values observed in the stratosphere within the Asian monsoon anticyclone still undergo significant freeze-drying and that water vapor concentrations set by the Lagrangian dry point are a better proxy for the stratospheric water vapor budget than rare observations of enhanced water mixing ratios.
Kara D. Lamb, Jerry Y. Harrington, Benjamin W. Clouser, Elisabeth J. Moyer, Laszlo Sarkozy, Volker Ebert, Ottmar Möhler, and Harald Saathoff
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6043–6064, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6043-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6043-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how ice grows directly from vapor in cirrus clouds by comparing observations of populations of ice crystals growing in a cloud chamber against models developed in the context of single-crystal laboratory studies. We demonstrate that previous discrepancies between different experimental measurements do not necessarily point to different physical interpretations but are rather due to assumptions that were made in terms of how experiments were modeled in previous studies.
Clare E. Singer, Benjamin W. Clouser, Sergey M. Khaykin, Martina Krämer, Francesco Cairo, Thomas Peter, Alexey Lykov, Christian Rolf, Nicole Spelten, Armin Afchine, Simone Brunamonti, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4767–4783, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4767-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4767-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In situ measurements of water vapor in the upper troposphere are necessary to study cloud formation and hydration of the stratosphere but challenging due to cold–dry conditions. We compare measurements from three water vapor instruments from the StratoClim campaign in 2017. In clear sky (clouds), point-by-point differences were <1.5±8 % (<1±8 %). This excellent agreement allows detection of fine-scale structures required to understand the impact of convection on stratospheric water vapor.
Sergey M. Khaykin, Elizabeth Moyer, Martina Krämer, Benjamin Clouser, Silvia Bucci, Bernard Legras, Alexey Lykov, Armin Afchine, Francesco Cairo, Ivan Formanyuk, Valentin Mitev, Renaud Matthey, Christian Rolf, Clare E. Singer, Nicole Spelten, Vasiliy Volkov, Vladimir Yushkov, and Fred Stroh
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3169–3189, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3169-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3169-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Asian monsoon anticyclone is the key contributor to the global annual maximum in lower stratospheric water vapour. We investigate the impact of deep convection on the lower stratospheric water using a unique set of observations aboard the high-altitude M55-Geophysica aircraft deployed in Nepal in summer 2017 within the EU StratoClim project. We find that convective plumes of wet air can persist within the Asian anticyclone for weeks, thereby enhancing the occurrence of high-level clouds.
Cited articles
Allcroft, D. J. and Glasbey, C. A.: A Latent Gaussian Markov Random-Field Model for Spatiotemporal Rainfall Disaggregation, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. C-App., 52, 487–498, 2003.
Barnes, E. A.: Revisiting the Evidence Linking Arctic Amplification to Extreme Weather in Midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4734–4739, 2013.
Barnes, E. A. and Polvani, L.: Response of the Midlatitude Jets, and of Their Variability, to Increased Greenhouse Gases in the CMIP5 Models, J. Climate, 26, 7117–7135, 2013.
Brillinger, D. R.: Time Series: Data Analysis and Theory, Vol. 36, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1981.
Collins, W. D., Bitz, C. M., Blackmon, M. L., Bonan, G. B., Bretherton, C. S., Carton, J. A.,Chang, P., Doney, S. C., Hack, J. J., Henderson, T. B., Kiehl, J. T., Large, W. G., McKenna, D. S., Santer, B. D., and Smith, R. D.: The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3), J. Climate, 19, 2122–2143, 2006.
Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. V.: Bootstrap Methods and Their Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.
Diaz-Nieto, J. and Wilby, R. L.: A Comparison of Statistical Downscaling and Climate Change Factor Methods: Impacts on Low Flows in the River Thames, United Kingdom, Climatic Change, 69, 245–268, 2005.
Eisner, S., Voss, F., and Kynast, E.: Statistical bias correction of global climate projections – consequences for large scale modeling of flood flows, Adv. Geosci., 31, 75–82, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-31-75-2012, 2012.
Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence Linking Arctic Amplification to Extreme Weather in Mid-Latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06801, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051000, 2012.
Hansen, J., Sato, M., and Ruedy, R.: Perception of Climate Change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, E2415–E2423, 2012.
Hawkins, E., Osborne, T. M., Ho, C. K., and Challinor, A. J.: Calibration and Bias Correction of Climate Projections for Crop Modelling: An Idealised Case Study over Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 170, 19–31, 2013.
Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming, J. Climate, 19, 5686–5699, 2006.
Ho, C., Stephenson, D., Collins, M., Ferro, C., and Brown, S.: Calibration Strategies: A Source of Additional Uncertainty in Climate Change Projections, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 21–26, 2012.
Huntingford, C., Jones, P. D., Livina, V. N., Lenton, T. M., and Cox, P. M.: No Increase in Global Temperature Variability Despite Changing Regional Patterns, Nature, 500, 327–330, 2013.
IPCC: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Working Group I Report "The Physical Science Basis", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007.
Karl, T., Knight, R., and Plummer, N.: Trends in High-Frequency Climate Variability in the Twentieth Century, Nature, 377, 217–220, 1995.
Lambert, S. J. and Boer, G. J.: CMIP1 Evaluation and Intercomparison of Coupled Climate Models, Clim. Dynam., 17, 83–106, 2001.
McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A.: Generalized Linear Models, Vol. 37, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1989.
Pawitan, Y. and O'Sullivan, F.: Nonparametric Spectral Density Estimation Using Penalized Whittle Likelihood, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 89, 600–610, 1994.
Priestley, M. B.: Non-Linear and Non-Stationary Time Series Analysis, Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 1988.
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P., Kistler, R., Woollen, J., Behringer, D., Liu, H., Stokes, D., Grumbine, R., Gayno, G., Wang, J., Hou, Y.-T., Chuang, H.-Y., Juang, H.-M. H., Sela, J., Iredell, M., Treadon, R., Kleist, D., Van Delst, P., Keyser, D., Derber, J., Ek, M., Meng, J., Wei, H., Yang, R., Lord, S., Van Den Dool, H., Kumar, A., Wang, W., Long, C., Chelliah, M., Xue, Y., Huang, B., Schemm, J.-K., Ebisuzaki, W., Lin, R., Xie, P., Chen, M., Zhou, S., Higgins, W., Zou, C.-Z., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Han, Y., Cucurull, L., Reynolds, R. W., Rutledge, G., and Goldberg, M.: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1015–1057, 2010.
Schär, C., Vidale, P. L., Lüthi, D., Frei, C., Häberli, C., Liniger, M. A., and Appenzeller, C.: The Role of Increasing Temperature Variability in European Summer Heatwaves, Nature, 427, 332–336, 2004.
Schlenker, W. and Roberts, M. J.: Nonlinear Temperature Effects Indicate Severe Damages to US Crop Yields Under Climate Change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 15594–15598, 2009.
Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: Exploring Links Between Arctic Amplification and Mid-Latitude Weather, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 959–964, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50174, 2013.
Shumway, R. H. and Stoffer, D. S.: Time Series Analysis and Its Applications: With R Examples, Springer, New York City, NY, 2011.
Timmermann, A., Oberhuber, J., Bacher, A., Esch, M., Latif, M., and Roeckner, E.: Increased El Niño Frequency in a Climate Model Forced by Future Greenhouse Warming, Nature, 398, 694–697, 1999.
Vose, R. S., Schmoyer, R. L., Steurer, P. M., Peterson, T. C., Heim, R., Karl, T. R., and Eischeid, J. K.: The Global Historical Climatology Network: Long-Term Monthly Temperature, Precipitation, Sea Level Pressure, and Station Pressure Data, Tech. rep., Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States). Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, 1992.
Wheeler, T. R., Craufurd, P. Q., Ellis, R. H., Porter, J. R., and Vara Prasad, P.: Temperature Variability and the Yield of Annual Crops, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 82, 159–167, 2000.
Whittle, P.: On Stationary Processes in the Plane, Biometrika, 41, 434–449, 1954.
Wood, A. W., Maurer, E. P., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Long-Range Experimental Hydrologic Forecasting for the Eastern United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 70, ACL6.1–ACL6.15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000659, 2002.
Wood, A. W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., and Lettenmaier, D.: Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Outputs, Climatic Change, 62, 189–216, 2004.