Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-7-13-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-7-13-2021
16 Feb 2021
 | 16 Feb 2021

Novel measures for summarizing high-resolution forecast performance

Eric Gilleland

Related authors

Space–time dependence of compound hot–dry events in the United States: assessment using a multi-site multi-variable weather generator
Manuela I. Brunner, Eric Gilleland, and Andrew W. Wood
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 621–634, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-621-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-621-2021, 2021
Short summary
Review article: Observations for high-impact weather and their use in verification
Chiara Marsigli, Elizabeth Ebert, Raghavendra Ashrit, Barbara Casati, Jing Chen, Caio A. S. Coelho, Manfred Dorninger, Eric Gilleland, Thomas Haiden, Stephanie Landman, and Marion Mittermaier
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1297–1312, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1297-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1297-2021, 2021
Short summary
Stochastic simulation of streamflow and spatial extremes: a continuous, wavelet-based approach
Manuela I. Brunner and Eric Gilleland
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3967–3982, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3967-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3967-2020, 2020
Short summary
A statistical approach to fast nowcasting of lightning potential fields
Joshua North, Zofia Stanley, William Kleiber, Wiebke Deierling, Eric Gilleland, and Matthias Steiner
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 79–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-79-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-79-2020, 2020
Short summary
Evaluating NARCCAP model performance for frequencies of severe-storm environments
Eric Gilleland, Melissa Bukovsky, Christopher L. Williams, Seth McGinnis, Caspar M. Ammann, Barbara G. Brown, and Linda O. Mearns
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 2, 137–153, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-137-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-137-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Statistics
Modeling general circulation model bias via a combination of localized regression and quantile mapping methods
Benjamin James Washington, Lynne Seymour, and Thomas L. Mote
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 9, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-9-1-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-9-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of simulated responses to climate forcings: a flexible statistical framework using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling – Part 1: Theory
Katarina Lashgari, Gudrun Brattström, Anders Moberg, and Rolf Sundberg
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 225–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-225-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-225-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of simulated responses to climate forcings: a flexible statistical framework using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling – Part 2: Numerical experiment
Katarina Lashgari, Anders Moberg, and Gudrun Brattström
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 249–271, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-249-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-249-2022, 2022
Short summary
A conditional approach for joint estimation of wind speed and direction under future climates
Qiuyi Wu, Julie Bessac, Whitney Huang, Jiali Wang, and Rao Kotamarthi
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 205–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-205-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-205-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing climate time series – Part 2: A multivariate test
Timothy DelSole and Michael K. Tippett
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 7, 73–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-7-73-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-7-73-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahijevych, D., Gilleland, E., Brown, B. G., and Ebert, E. E.: Application of spatial verification methods to idealized and NWP-gridded precipitation forecasts, Weather Forecast., 24, 1485–1497, 2009. a, b, c, d, e
Baddeley, A. J.: Errors in binary images and an Lp version of the Hausdorff metric, Nieuw Arch. Wiskunde, 10, 157–183, 1992a. a, b, c, d
Baddeley, A. J.: An error metric for binary images, in: Robust Computer Vision Algorithms, edited by: Forstner, W. and Ruwiedel, S., Wichmann, 402 pp., 59–78, available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa50/669b71429f2ca54d64f93839a9da95ceba6b.pdf (last access: 14 May 2020), 1992b. a, b, c, d, e, f
Baddeley, A. and Turner, R.: spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns, J. Stat. Softw., 12, 1–42, available at: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v12/i06/ (last access: 11 February 2021), 2005. a
Baldwin, M. E. and Elmore, K. L.: Objective verification of high-resolution WRF forecasts during 2005 NSSL/SPC Spring Program, in: 21st Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/17th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Washington, D.C., 11B4, 2005. a
Download
Short summary
Verifying high-resolution weather forecasts has become increasingly complicated, and simple, easy-to-understand summary measures are a good alternative. Recent work has demonstrated some common pitfalls with many such summaries. Here, new summary measures are introduced that do not suffer from these drawbacks, while still providing meaningful information.